Тема сайта
Авторизация
Спецпроекты
Популярное
Тоже интересное
Кое-что важное

Почему сорвались секретные антивоенные переговоры с Финляндией

Димон
4380160
4 года назад · 4924 просмотров
После вакханалии «исторических открытий» и переоценки ценностей конца 1980-х – первой половины 1990-х годов утверждать, что Советский Союз изначально не хотел войны с Финляндией, значит навлечь на себя гнев подавляющего большинства либеральных профессоров истории и всей Высшей школы экономики разом.

Источник:

Fishki в Телеграм
Посты на ту же тему
25 комментариев
Лучший комментарий
Matti meikalainen
−5

4 года назад
"Валерий 21 час назад финны участвовали в блокаде Ленинграда. мне этого достаточно."

This infact is incorrect.

Siege of Leningrad happened after winterwar but the case here relates to the later siege of (8 September 1941 - 27 January 1944)

In Continuation War (Finnish term for the separate war between Finland and U.S.S.R between 1941-1944 or Russian term Soviet-Finnish Front of the Great Patriotic War) Finland did not take active role in siege of Leningrad.

1.Finnish leadership denied demands of German high command to take part in the assault of Leningrad (Source: Max Jakobson, Väkivallan vuodet, 1999, page 330)
2.Finnish airforce did not bomb Leningrad once. Mannerheim forbid this (Source: G. Mannerheim, Muistelmat, Toinen osa, 1952, page 324)
3.Finnish long range artillery did not once shoot to the city of Leningrad. (Also forbidden my Mannerheim)
4.Finland did not allow German troops in Finnish territory in Area southern territory be stationed for siege of Leningrad.
5.Finnish forced did not take active role preventing "Road of life" over lake Lagoka being used what in fact was the only real way to evacuate civilians after 19 November 1941.

Reasons for the lackluster interest to take part in operations against Leningrad by Finnish leadership was.

1.Finland had it's own self preservation in mind. Finland had entered the war to reclaim the areas it had lost during winterwar to Soviet union not to claim new conquests.
2.Finnish leadership made conscious decision to limit the aggressiveness of Finnish troops to gain political capital with soviet union (Source: Wolf H. Halsti, Kesäsota 1941 (Sarjasta Suomen Sota 1939-1945 II osa), page 72
3.In general Finnish mentality culture not to mention manpower (Nation of 3 million at the time) did not induce situation where Finnish troops would be ready to fight war of conquest.

It is good to say we had very far sighted and wise leaders at the time in Finland who saw the risks of taking part of siege of Leningrad and other operations (for example operation to cut the Murmask railway what also was forbidden my Mannerheim)
They correctly reasoned if Finnish would threaten vital interests of Soviet nation the Russian people who would always exists would one day take revenge.
Finland had no racial or fascistic fervor nor interest in them (although there were some symptoms but these were suppressed by Government and the secret police SUPO)

All this in effect saved Finland in the aftermath where Stalin made peace with Finland (4th November 1944) with quite lenient terms (Border of 1939 winter war and loss of Petsamo and substantial war reparations)

Finnish Bloke.
 

Удалить комментарий?

Удалить Отмена
Показать 25 комментариев

На что жалуетесь?